跳到主要內容區

 

期刊目錄列表-第十五期索引【教育評鑑研究期刊】(1026月出版)

100 年度大學校務評鑑結果研究:質與量的重要性分析 [詳全文]

作者:  王彥方、林信耀、王保進

刊期:第15
日期20136
頁碼31-56
DOI10.6866/JEAE

摘要:
本研究旨在以內容分析法針對100 年度大學校務評鑑報告進行分析,探究認可結果與認可要素間之關係、認可結果與辦學量化指標間之關係、以及認可要素與辦學量化指標間之關係,藉此檢視質性認可要素與辦學量化指標對認可結果之重要性為何。研究發現大學校務評鑑認可要素確實對認可結果具影響力,且辦學量化指標表現並非影響認可結果之關鍵,認可要素表現與辦學量化指標間亦多呈現無顯著相關之情形,據此提出相關建議。

關鍵詞:大學評鑑、校務評鑑、內容分析

 

 

Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, June 2013, Vol. 15

University Evaluation in Taiwan: The Importance of Qualitative Elements and Quantitative Indicators

Author : Yen-Fang Wang, Hsin-Yao Lin, Bao-Jinn Wang

Vol.&No. No. 15
DateJune 2013
Pages31-56
DOI10.6866/JEAE

Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the 2011 University Evaluation Reports through content analysis. In this study, we explore the relationship between the accredited results and the accredited elements, the relationship between the accredited results and the quantitative indicators, and the relationship between the accredited elements and the quantitative indicators to verify the importance between accredited elements and quantitative indicators. We found that the accredited elements of the University Evaluation Report truly affect the accreditation results. The quantitative indicators are not key factors affecting the accredited results, and there are no significant effects between the accredited elements and the quantitative indicators in universities. Finally we propose some suggestions on the basis of these findings.

Keywords university evaluation, school evaluation, content analysis