跳到主要內容區

期刊目錄列表-第三十三期索引【教育評鑑研究期刊】(1126月出版)

教育創業家精神融入中小學校長儲訓班課程內容與實施方式之研究

[詳全文]

作者:蔡進雄

刊期:第33
日期20236
頁碼:29-64
DOI10.6866/JEAE

摘要:

本研究在探究創業家精神及教育創業家精神之意涵,且以質性訪談分析研究途徑,了解受訪者對中小學校長儲訓課程納入教育創業家精神之不同觀點,並藉由融入式課程方式,探討教育創業家精神融入中小學校長儲訓之可能情形,最後根據研究發現與結論,提出建議以作為精進國內中小學校長培育成效之參考。
透過文獻探討、個別訪談及焦點團體訪談,本研究獲得以下結論:(一)教育創業家精神融入中小學校長儲訓有其必要性及價值性;(二)教育創業家精神融入校長儲訓課程內容可包括教育創業家精神理念、校長教育創業與英雄之旅、教育創意與設計思維、教育創新與教育行銷、隨創理論與學校特色、團隊合作等;(三)教育創業家精神融入校長儲訓教學方法可包括對話分享、小組討論、實務分享、專題實作演練、個案研討、異業學習、移地學習及體驗探索等多元教學方式;(四)教育創業家精神融入中小學校長儲訓課程時宜注意非營利的屬性、需先有教育創業家精神之理念介紹及培養校長教育使命感與執行力。基於前述之研究結論,最後對中小學校長儲訓課程、中小學學校領導人及未來研究等三方面提出具體建議。

關鍵詞:校長儲訓班、教育創業家精神、創業家精神

 

Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, June 2023, Vol. 33

A Study on the Infusion of Entrepreneurship in the Curriculum and
Implementation of Principal Training Program

Author: Chin-Hsiung Tsai

Since 2006, the university program evaluation in our country has been entrusted to professional evaluation agencies by the Ministry of Education. After two cycles of implementation, the compulsory program evaluation policy was discontinued in February 2017, and replaced with a voluntary program evaluation. The evolution, promotion, and decision-making process of the program evaluation policy is worth exploring. Therefore, this study first uses documentary analysis to collect relevant policies and documents related to university program evaluation,as well as evaluation results data, to understand the purpose and
effectiveness of the Ministry of Education's promotion of program evaluation. Secondly, the rationality of the program evaluation policy is explored from the perspectives of policy objectivity, prudence, and
organizational objectives. Finally, based on the research results,conclusions are drawn and recommendations are proposed as a reference for future university program evaluation policies in Taiwan.
In terms of the evolution of the program evaluation policy, the conclusion of this study is that there are discrepancies between the practical methods and policy strategies of program evaluation, the professionalization of evaluation is too late, and the consideration for universities and colleges to conduct their own program evaluations is not comprehensive. In terms of the rationality of the program evaluation policy,this study concludes that the promotion of program evaluation is reasonable in objectively examining the quality of programs. However, the timing of promotion is slightly late, the promotion of evaluation policy is too eager and different from international practices, and there are still shortcomings in prudence, and the policies are compliance with the purpose of promoting program evaluation by the Ministry of Education,which have organizational rationality. Regarding the rationality of suspending program evaluation, the conclusion is that the high passing rate of evaluation results and the matching of various evaluation policies objectively demonstrate the rationality of suspending program evaluation
by the Ministry of Education. However, there is still room for improvement in careful planning, and although the Ministry of Education has suspended program evaluation, it requires universities and colleges to ensure the quality of programs, which has organizational rationality.

Keywords: rationality, program evaluation, accreditation

 

Vol.&No.Vol. 33
DateJune 2023
Pages29-64
DOI10.6866/JEAE