|
期刊目錄列表-第三十三期索引【教育評鑑研究期刊】(112年6月出版) |
|
我國大學校院系所評鑑政策沿革與評析 [詳全文]
作者：池俊吉 |
|
刊期：第33期 |
|
摘要： 我國大學校院系所評鑑自2006 年起由教育部委託專業評鑑機構辦理以來，經歷兩週期的辦理，於2017 年2 月由教育部部長宣布停辦，強制性系所評鑑政策僅維持11 年就退場，改成自主性系所評鑑，系所評鑑政策的沿革、推動與停辦的決策過程為何是值得探討的。因此，本研究首先採用文件分析法，蒐集大學校院系所評鑑相關的評鑑政策與系所評鑑相關之公文、文件與評鑑結果資料並進行歸納整理與分析，藉此瞭解教育部推動系所評鑑之目的與成效；其次從政策的客觀性、慎思性與組織的角度來探討系所評鑑政策的合理性；最後，根據研究結果歸納結論並提出建議作為我國未來大學校院系所評鑑政策之參考。在系所評鑑政策的沿革面向，本研究之結論為大學校院系所評鑑實務作法與評鑑政策略有扞格、評鑑專業化期程過晚及大學校院自辦系所評鑑的考量不夠完備；在系所評鑑政策的合理性面向，本研究得出在推動的合理性方面有以下結論：以系所評鑑來檢視系所品質客觀上具合理性，但推動時機略嫌過晚、評鑑政策推動過於急切且異於國際作法，慎思上仍有不足及符合教育部推動系所評鑑之目的，具組織上的合理性；在系所評鑑停辦的合理性方面，得出評鑑結果通過率高以及各項評鑑政策的配套給予教育部停辦系所評鑑客觀上的合理性、慎思上的合理性在停辦規劃上仍有強化空間及教育部雖停辦系所評鑑但留有大學校院需確保系所品質之機制，具組織上合理性之結論。
關鍵詞：合理性、系所評鑑、認可 |
|
|
|
Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, June 2023, Vol. 33 |
|
The Evolution and Analysis of Program Evaluation Policies in Taiwan Author: Chun-Chi Chih Since 2006, the university program evaluation in our country has been entrusted to professional evaluation agencies by the Ministry of Education. After two cycles of implementation, the compulsory program evaluation policy was discontinued in February 2017, and replaced with a voluntary program evaluation. The evolution, promotion, and decision-making process of the program evaluation policy is worth exploring. Therefore, this study first uses documentary analysis to collect relevant policies and documents related to university program evaluation,as well as evaluation results data, to understand the purpose and In terms of the evolution of the program evaluation policy, the conclusion of this study is that there are discrepancies between the practical methods and policy strategies of program evaluation, the professionalization of evaluation is too late, and the consideration for universities and colleges to conduct their own program evaluations is not comprehensive. In terms of the rationality of the program evaluation policy,this study concludes that the promotion of program evaluation is reasonable in objectively examining the quality of programs. However, the timing of promotion is slightly late, the promotion of evaluation policy is too eager and different from international practices, and there are still shortcomings in prudence, and the policies are compliance with the purpose of promoting program evaluation by the Ministry of Education,which have organizational rationality. Regarding the rationality of suspending program evaluation, the conclusion is that the high passing rate of evaluation results and the matching of various evaluation policies objectively demonstrate the rationality of suspending program evaluation by the Ministry of Education. However, there is still room for improvement in careful planning, and although the Ministry of Education has suspended program evaluation, it requires universities and colleges to ensure the quality of programs, which has organizational rationality. Keywords: rationality, program evaluation, accreditation
|
|
Vol.&No.：Vol. 33 |