跳到主要內容區

 

期刊目錄列表-第十六期索引【教育評鑑研究期刊】(10212月出版)

臺北市國小專業發展學校遴選指標建構之研 [詳全文]

作者:  丁一顧、莊念青、林信耀

刊期:第16
日期201312
頁碼27-42
DOI10.6866/JEAE

摘要:
本研究旨在建構及探究臺北市國民小學專業發展學校遴選指標。研究方法首先採專家問卷審查以及模糊德懷術調查方法,藉以確立「國民小學專業發展學校遴選指標」。本研究主要研究結果有:(1)臺北市國小專業發展學校遴選指標可包括學習社群、績效責任與品質保證、夥伴協作、多樣與公平、以及結構、資源與角色等五大向度,其中,各向度的重要性以「績效責任與品質保證」較高,各向度之重點則是「關注學生學習」與「探究」;(2)臺北市國小專業發展學校遴選指標之五大向度內涵,共計41 項指標,且各向度中各個指標之相對適當性不一。最後,最後,研究者根據結論,提出相關建議,俾供專業發展學校實務推動、以及未來研究之參考。

關鍵詞:專業發展學校、遴選指標、教師專業發展

 

 

Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, December 2013, Vol. 16

The Construction of Indicators for Primary Professional Development Schools in Taipei City

Author : Yi-Ku Ting, Nien-Ching Chuang, Hsin-Yao Lin

Vol.&No. No. 16
DateDecember 2013
Pages27-42
DOI10.6866/JEAE

Abstract
In this study, we developed and examined selection indicators for primary professional development schools in Taipei City. We used expert questionnaire reviews and fuzzy Delphi survey methods to establish the “Selection Indicators for Primary Professional Development Schools.” The results obtained are as follows: (1) Selection indicators for primary professional development schools in Taipei City comprised the five dimensions of learning communities; accountability and quality assurance; partnerships; diversity and fairness; structure, resources, and roles. Accountability and quality assurance had the greatest importance. The focal points of each dimension were “concern for student learning” and “inquiry.” (2) The five dimensions of the selection indicators for primary professional development schools in Taipei are comprised of 41 indicators. The relative appropriateness of the indicators in each dimension was inconsistent. Finally, we presented suggestions based on our conclusions for practice and promotion in professional development schools and for reference in future studies.

Keywords professional development schools, selection indicators, teachers’ professional

development