期刊目錄列表-第十一期索引【教育評鑑研究期刊】(100年6月出版)

教育評鑑人員專業化指標之建構及其實證研究：以臺北市國民中小學教育評鑑人員為例  [詳全文]

作者：高麗鳳、吳清山

刊期：第11期
日期：2011年6月
頁碼：29-62
DOI：10.6866/JEAE

摘要：
本研究目的旨在建構我國國民中小學教育評鑑人員專業化指標系統；及檢視國民中小學教育評鑑委員及受評學校對評鑑人員專業化指標的符合程度。本研究方法以問卷調查法為主，並採模糊德懷術及模糊層級分析法來統整分析調查意見。所獲致的研究結論：（一）「國民中小學教育評鑑人員專業化指標」系統，結構上包含四個層面、十八個主指標、80 個次指標，以專業素養層面權重比率最高；（二）專業素養層面包含評鑑專業知識、教育專業知識、研究方法知識、規劃管理能力、人際關係能力、及資料處理能力等主指標，以「評鑑專業知識」權重比率最高；（三）專業倫理層面包含工作倫理、人際倫理、及社會倫理等主指標，以「工作倫理」權重比率最高；（四）專業服務層面包含專業態度、專業責任、專業精神、專業承諾、及服務導向等主指標，以「專業責任」權重比率最高；（五）專業發展層面包含專業組識、專業進修、專業資歷及社會認同等主指標，以「專業資歷」權重比率最高；（六）臺北市國民中小學教育評鑑訪視委員及受評學校均認為本研究所建立專業化指標與現況達到大部分符合的程度。

關鍵詞：教育評鑑人員、專業化指標、教育評鑑、國民中小學

Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, June 2011, Vol. 11

The Study on Application and Construction of the Professionalization Indicators for Educational Evaluators in Public Elementary and Junior High Schools

Author : Li-Feng Kao, Ching-Shan Wu

Vol.&No.： No. 11
Date： June 2011
Pages：29-62
DOI：10.6866/JEAE

Abstract：
The main purpose of this study is to construct professional indicators for education evaluators in public elementary and junior high schools. To examine the appropriateness of the professional indicators for educational evaluators and evaluated school staffs in public elementary and junior high schools, this study employed questionnaire surveys, then used Fuzzy Delphi analysis and Fuzzy Hierarchical analysis to construct questionnaire details. The conclusions of this study are as follows:（1）The professional indicators for public elementary and junior high school educational evaluators in Taiwan consisted of four broad categories, eighteen main indicators, and eighty secondary indicators. The four broad categories included professional attainment, professional ethics, professional services, and professional developments in which the weighting for professional attainment is the highest among all other categories. （2）There were six main indicators and twenty-nine secondary indicators in the professional attainment categories. The weighting for professional evaluation knowledge was the highest among those main indicators. （3）There were three main indicators and fifteen secondary indicators in the professional ethics categories. The weighting of work ethics was the highest among those main indicators. （4）There were five main indicators and twenty secondary indicators in the professional service categories. The weighting of professional responsibilities was the highest among those main indicators. （5）There were four main indicators and sixteen secondary indicators in the professional developments categories. The weighting of professional qualifications and experiences was the highest among those main indicators. （6）The education evaluators and staffs from evaluated schools from Taipei’s public elementary and junior high schools believed that the current professional indicator system reflects its main objective .

Keywords： educational evaluator, professionalization indicator, educational evaluation, public elementary and junior high schools