期刊目錄列表-第三十五期索引【教育評鑑研究期刊】(113年6月出版)

高雄市國民中學學校評鑑應用之研究 [詳全文]

作者：蔡旻宏

刊期：第35期
日期：2024年6月
頁碼：75-130
DOI：10.6866/JEAE

摘要：

近年學校評鑑應用議題逐步獲得重視，研究應用「過程性應用」（process use）與「結果性應用」（findings use）作為分類規準。研究採調查研究法，以高雄市國民中學曾參與該次學校評鑑工作之校長、行政主管與教師為主，編訂「高雄市國民中學學校評鑑應用之調查問卷」。選取受評學校之方式採取分層抽樣（stratified sampling），共有25 所受評學校接受調查。本研究共發出問卷488 份，實際回收444 份，剔除無效問卷後，有效回收率80.3%。資料分析處理運用IBM SPSS Statistic 22，進行描述性與推論性統計分析。本研究發現，國民中學學校評鑑參與者對於過程性應用之知覺程度高於結果性應用；國民中學學校評鑑參與者知覺過程性應用為中高程度，其中以「習得評鑑知能」最高，「鼓舞成員士氣」最低；國民中學學校評鑑參與者知覺結
果性應用為中等程度，其中以「促進決定依據」最高，「強化校務發展」最低；校長、教師兼主任、高度參與、一般地區之評鑑參與者，在過程性應用普遍有較高知覺；校長、高度參與之評鑑參與者，在學校評鑑結果性應用普遍有較高知覺；國民中學學校評鑑參與者知覺過程性應用、結果性應用彼此呈現正相關。本研究依據研究結論並分別對於學校端、評鑑端、未來研究提出具體建議，以供學校成員參酌之。

關鍵詞：高雄市、結果性應用、過程性應用、評鑑應用、學校評鑑

Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, June 2024, Vol. 35

A Study on the Use of School Evaluation of Junior High Schools in Kaohsiung City

Author: Min-Hung Tsai

Vol.&No.: Vol. 35
Date: June 2024
Pages: 75-130
DOI: 10.6866/JEAE

Abstract:

In recent years, school evaluation has become a critical educational issue, and the evaluation end expects the evaluated schools to use the review in subsequent school planning. Even if the relevant findings were not used, the effect of the transformation of the participants' changes in thinking and attitude in the evaluation process. In this study, "process use" and "findings use" were the principal axes of research. This study aimed to evaluate the use of junior high schools in Kaohsiung. The research subjects  were Principals, Directors of School affairs divisions, Section Chiefs of School affairs divisions, homeroom teachers, and subject teachers of junior high schools who had participated in school evaluation. This study conducted a questionnaire survey. Four hundred eighty-eight principals and teachers drawn from 25 junior high schools in Kaohsiung participated in this study. Consequently, 392 questionnaires were effectively collected. The effective response rate was 80.3%. The data analysis method used descriptive statistics, item analysis, reliability analysis, independent samples t-test, dependent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, Canonical correlation, and other statistical methods. The main conclusions are shown as follows. First, process use was given higher scores than findings use. Second, process use in Kaohsiung was moderately high. Third, the findings used in Kaohsiung were moderate. Fourth, principals, Directors of School affairs divisions, high participants,
and participants in urban areas who were more involved in school evaluation gave higher scores to process use than other participants. Fifth, principals and high participants who were more engaged in school
evaluations gave higher scores for findings used than other participants. Sixth, there was a significant correlation between process use and findings use. Finally, based on the above findings, this study provided some implications for policy-making and school improvement.

Keywords: Kaohsiung, findings use, process use, evaluation use, school evaluation